20 Feb 2010 @ 1:30 PM 

The issue is not likely an actual dearth of knowledge or knowing. Rather, it’s unimpeded access to the information. There are so many inspiring people who allow incredible volume and quality of information to come through. Think Rain Man.

But I’m not talking savant courses here.  

Simply, there is a point past which the thinking process is more or less counterproductive. That’s partly because the process of thinking is more in the nature of an aggregator and translator of information rather than an independent source.  More on that point at another time.

For now, let’s just look at the practical dynamics.

Thinking tends to work until that special moment when it becomes redundant, repetitive and or generates a feeling of being compulsive and out of balance. At that point, which is likely a feeling of frustration and confusion, you only need switch your attention from the thinking process to another stream or avenue of communication. That could include a move to, for example, your feelings, your emotions, even just your relaxed sense of things.

Of course this presupposes that you have become consciously aware of what’s going on internally so that you recognize the point at which you are becoming confused or befuddled by way of your thoughts. 

As you accomplish that awareness, at that point, as you switch from thinking toward an internal channel of communication within yourself, you can get a real sense of the Rain Man within.  No savant course required.

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

.

Copyright © 2008-2010 Joseph Fedorowsky. All Rights Reserved.

.

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 20 Feb 2010 @ 01:32 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 13 Feb 2010 @ 7:31 PM 

Not talking installment credit, train schedules or information downloads. 

We’re talking t-i-m-e, as, in-the-moment, here-and-now, pristine, real, as real as it gets. 

Why, you ask; who knows, really.  Yes, there are explanations, so please, calm down.  But explanations are not experiences. The why question tends to go round-and-round, rarely (read: never) answered within your experience

For the experience itself, just ask the how question and act on it. How includes the why, but through the possibility of an actual experience within physicality. And the experience is what makes it real, for you.

Relatively real? Yes, relatively real, but real no less.    

More on the actual how . . . later.

P.S.  By the way, here’s a mini course on time.  Yes, it’s free.

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

.

Copyright © 2008-2010 Joseph Fedorowsky. All Rights Reserved.

.

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 13 Feb 2010 @ 07:31 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 06 Feb 2010 @ 11:34 AM 

Here’s the thing; time is not the unwavering constant is may appear to be. Whether you’re scientifically oriented or religiously oriented (by your beliefs, that is), the dimensional experience of time is far more flexible than believed, taught and assumed.

Parenthetically, I will note that both scientific and religious beliefs are somewhat opposite perspectives which will inevitably, in due course, meet up with one another, within both our personal and our collective beliefs.  More on that later, much later.

On the face of it, the flexibility assertion itself is purely intellectual. I understand that. However, you already, constantly, in many ways and on innumerable occasions, experience flexibility with time. The point being that you can consciously take it off the mental platform by positioning yourself within the experiential platform.   

How do you do that, you ask?  Not a problem. Not a big secret. Not as if there’s any disagreement.

Simply access your existing reality within the dynamic of right here and right now, at this moment.

Huh?

Well, it does take more to explain it than do it!  And since I have already written on this many times, if you’re interested, have a quick read (yes, it’s free) on how to Unleash Your Power In This Pristine Moment and then c’mon back. This site is more fun.

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

.

Copyright © 2008-2010 Joseph Fedorowsky. All Rights Reserved.

.

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 12 Feb 2010 @ 01:27 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 03 Feb 2010 @ 5:14 PM 

On one side of the line you’ve got the constant impossibly immense problem of time and space. 

Not enough time, unrelenting time, doing time. 

Physical limitation, not enough space, infinite space (aka spaced out).  

Result: hope for heaven, expect a pitch fork, take what’s thrown at you.   

On the other side of the line you’ve got the miracle of flexible time and the intricate beauty of inner and outer space. 

Flowing time, a time for all things, time of your life. 

Artful expression, microcosmic worlds within worlds, unfathomable areas of exploration (aka life creation).

Result: rendezvous with your dreams, meditate and reflect within, inspired creative expression.

Question.  From this perspective, what side of the line do you fancy?

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

.

Copyright © 2008-2010 Joseph Fedorowsky. All Rights Reserved.

.

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 12 Feb 2010 @ 01:26 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 01 Feb 2010 @ 9:53 AM 

Yes, it’s true, an earlier HRW website version is still on the Server.  The older links still connect on Google. 

To see it:  click on the Link ==> over there ==> on the Blogroll ==>  Earlier HRW Version

When you click on the Home nav link, it’ll go to the current Home page.  Otherwise, everything still works, including the contact page.

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 12 Feb 2010 @ 01:28 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 01 Feb 2010 @ 9:25 AM 

Essentially it’s subjective. I mean, in the sense of personal and individual (not in the sense of skewed or biased). Not measured or measurable, which implies a standard used for the personal and individual. If I’m not mistaken, the word for illusion in Sanskrit (maya) also indicates measuring and measurement.

Putting aside the issue of identity, we have some agreement within as well as between ourselves in relation to the expression of objective reality. That is to say: multiple, innumerable, concurrently and simultaneously expansive objective realities. But not actually in linear order, other than for processing, of course.

I like using the word physicality in this context. The expression of objective reality, not limited to physical matter in the sense of merely physical things. Let’s say, experiential matter in the sense of including interaction within all of physicality, such as would include thought and the sense of contained identity.  

Objective allows for craft. Objective being an expression within physicality of subjective, personal, individual creation.

Subjective allows for creativity. Creation of reality. Your perception of your individual and collective reality.

What this means to me (at least this morning), is that in the day-to-day world there’s a whole lot of room to create and express physicality and movement.  The limits are essentially self imposed and collectively agreed to in some fashion.

I’ve been thinking of this in terms of an agreement to jump into water. Once there is that agreement, and that action, there is wetness. Separating the agreement from the wetness creates the victim.  Accepting the wetness allows for acknowledgment and expression of immense creativity.    

Joseph Fedorowsky / How Reality Works

.

Copyright © 2008-2010 Joseph Fedorowsky. All Rights Reserved.

.

Posted By: Joseph Fedorowsky
Last Edit: 12 Feb 2010 @ 01:29 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags

Buttermilk Biscuits :: Addicting Games :: Party Rentals Sacramento :: themmorpgexchange.com :: Sun Shades For Windows
 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 1
  • Posts/Pages » 10
  • Comments » 0
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

Admin



    No Child Pages.

Terms



    No Child Pages.

Privacy



    No Child Pages.